Berlin Station for real this time: Episode 1 [spoilers]

I gave first impressions of this episode when I saw it, so I am not going to regurgitate that. At this point, I’ll share general impressions. I’ll get back to a Spooks 9-style analysis when we get to an episode I have not seen (in two weeks), because at that point I’m not going to be able to manage two media platforms while watching the show (or at least I hope it will remain complex enough that that is the case). All of these posts WILL have spoilers in them.



Though it’s a silly thing to keep saying — it’s just nothing short of amazing to me to be watching Richard Armitage in first run on the full size television in our living room! My phone camera isn’t fast enough to capture individual scenes but I’ve spent so much time seeing him in first run either on my computer screen (which often involved illegal activities) or by paying money for every opportunity in movie theater. I know I’m going to get excited every week when I see him in this amazing resolution. I feel like I finally get to do something that UK viewers got to do every week, earlier in Armitage’s career.

There are a million things I could say about my impressions of this episode, but I’m going to focus on a few.

First, tempo and rhythm. The title sequence and then the first sequence of the series, in which Daniel Miller is shot, held up really well for me and in fact, I found this episode to be faster tempo than when I saw it the first time (I think because on that viewing, I rushed through both episodes at once because I was afraid the vids would disappear, and I got tired in about the last half hour). In general, it seemed much peppier and lighter than it did to me on first examination. It’s been interesting to me that the reviewers have reacted to precisely this element of the show in such varying ways.

Second, and I feel like this is sort of the decisive aspect of this episode for me so far — much less so than the unfolding story, maybe because I’ve had weeks to think about that story, now — was the whole question of Daniel’s identity: murdered (?) spy; competent operative in Panama; organization man in Berlin hiding covert manipulator behind the scenes. The best of Richard Armitage’s acting comes when he unsettles me, and this is the main reason that I actually defend Spooks 9: because I feel that in that series he did a great job of showing us how many different people a man can be. There’s a feeling of that, or at least the opportunity of it, in this episode that emerges at odd moments, and one has to be watching. I feel like a number of reviewers who have criticized his character as boring or too straight arrow have sort of missed these: the cold look on his face during the opening sequence; the way he looks aghast as his smile fades after re-encounter Hector de Jean; the repeated evasions of Valerie’s gentle digging for what his background means to him; the changing expressions on his face in the party boat, after he drinks the sparkling wine; and, I think, most of all in the scenes with Claudia. This unsettled me at first watch and it hasn’t changed.


Part of it is that I’ve seen Americans playing that game in Germany so many times, sometimes consciously, sometimes unconsciously — I’ll turn on my natural New World charm and you won’t be able to stop smiling at me. (Does Armitage know this? That is a piece of it for me, too, that I know in reality he is nothing like this, but I also wonder how much he knows about the execution of this particular stereotype in bars all over Europe.) Part of it is that we are so accustomed to him playing superheroes or supervillains that this everyday person — to me, anyway, it came across as a bit of a shock. Not so much in the scene that lays him physically barest; I’m starting to think that what that brief glance of his physique without clothes is supposed to tell is that underneath all of his guises, Daniel is a panther, a carnivore lurking on the margins. But in the bar scene — the way he plays that charming, clueless American — the guileful way in which he makes “Kevin” look guileless — I don’t know. The reviews seem to think that his (and the scene with Valerie in the office) make him boring: but he seems to have sold them in such a way that they’ve forgotten he’s a spy and this smiling innocence is all just another game of the spy. In short, even the everyday American trying to get into Claudia’s pants, who backs off with innocent kiss at her door the first time, is a manipulation.

It just occurred to me: he’s playing an American version of Harry Kennedy, but as an intentional lie. I don’t like Harry Kennedy inter alia because he seems unreal to me — but he’s harmless to most viewers; here the harmless, cheery fellow who wears not only his heart but also his thoughts on his sleeve is real, but not in the way that we suspect. In any case, it’s all a little disturbing, I find. It’s another piece of how Armitage views humanity that I hadn’t seen yet.

Finally, the last thing that would be worthy of discussion here is Michelle Forbes’ performance as Valerie. As much as my estimation of the actor falls nearly every time she opens her mouth, I like this character and think she’s doing a fantastic job of revealing her to us. I should say more, but I have to go to bed. Hopefully this week. Or someone else will.

~ by Servetus on October 17, 2016.

18 Responses to “Berlin Station for real this time: Episode 1 [spoilers]”

  1. I see live tweeting, early this morning.Now I read your comment. I want to see more and more. But I don’t know how? It’s very frustrating. Please send your commentary, so I read more about Berlin Station. Thanks.


    • I hope the distribution situation resolves itself soon. Fans in Poland and Romania have started to see it available on HBO.


  2. One thing that really stayed with me after watching the first two episodes was the speed with which RA turned Miller’s friendly vibe off and his cold agent vibe on….really impressive and a bit scary!!!


    • Yeah, I agree. In that scene with Hector, it’s cheery bonhomie, buddy buddy guys talking, and then you realize that they are not friendly at all.


  3. the ‘everyday American’ persona threw me the first time I saw it as well. I really liked it, on a personal level, but it also blew me away from an ‘Armitage acting’ angle. it is so unlike him, that it impressed me the same way that Francis Dollarhyde impressed me. not that Daniel came off as sinister or that Richard himself is not an “everyday” man in real life, but just that I could really see him stepping outside of his box. although I do like Harry Kennedy, I too find him unreal, but I found “Kevin” very real, which is why it threw me.


    • Yeah — even though I know it’s not intended that way, in that he’s sincerely playing the character, if I saw it out of context I’d almost think he was making fun of that type of man, it’s just so spot on. Like he’d been watching American men in office situations for years or something. Although I do think the sheer contrast to Thorin and Dolarhyde also plays a role in my shock.


  4. On second viewing, I liked the first episode better, and agree that the pacing at the beginning felt exciting. Still, there are so many characters and plots in the opening episode and their relationships so strained that I found it confusing.

    I think Richard’s two strongest scenes were with Claudia and Valerie. I don’t know how any reviewer can complain about him being stiff after watching those scenes. If there are any women reviewers, I doubt they would feel the same way!

    Other times he either blends into the woodwork or seems distant and mysterious, which I believe is how he is written but may come across as stiff. The weakest scene, and the one for which I think the accent complaints are justified, was the one with his boss in Panama. His speech sounded very deliberate and forced like Dolarhyde’s (where such speech was appropriate). Otherwise, his accent was fine to me.

    I think the show is quite promising, and even if the reviews are not glowing, they are good enough to get people to watch. The one worry is that it is hard to get EPIX, and so people have to be motivated to watch.


    • You know, that’s a good point — most of the reviewers I’ve rea are men.

      re: Panama — I thought that was preening for the boss.

      There are subplots that I already find boring (Steve’s adultery, for instance, but I usually find stories about adultery tedious). I wonder if they need all that. But it’s a kind of characteristic of a Steinhauer novel — it all plays a role in the end.


      • I remember some ITS reviews written by men that sounded like they were jealous of Richard. I think some men don’t react well to a guy that is well-liked by ladies, and assume he can’t have any substance. But beyond any sort of issues of bias, I was truly moved by the scenes with Valerie and Claudia. Maybe men experience those scenes differently.


      • I think that situation may lead to more about Sandra, than it does him.


  5. sigh* what a relief , cuz I was surprised or even 😳embarrased … Never thought that he has this Kevin at his disposal . What a versatile weapon😉 I mean actor he is !


  6. American version of Harry Kennedy – I’d never have thought of that! And yes, I think I can see that. 🙂 I have to say, these glimpses of ‘normal Daniel’ really intrigue me and make me wonder – which part is true-Daniel and which part is acted-Daniel and where do these two blend? I wonder if future episodes will tell us that.
    What also really interests me is what to you feels unreal about Harry Kennedy? Because to me he felt very real and I’m wondering whether it’s a European vs an American viewpoint thing? Or maybe it’s just me? If you have blogged about that before sometime in the past, feel free to point me to the post about it. 🙂


    • I haven’t ever blogged about him in depth, because most of the time I really dislike that character and he is so much loved in the Armitage fandom and it’s a nest that I haven’t yet felt the need to poke (I choose my battles, lol). It would take a lot of words to explain. Someday …

      Liked by 1 person

      • That’s OK, I was just curious… I don’t want you to get stung over something that is less important. 🙂


        • I have an increasingly long list of “things I’d like to say someday but aren’t pressing” — if I ever run out of current problems on my mind, lol 🙂

          I do think that if one says something that one knows in advance is problematic one has to be willing to experience a certain amount of backwind — which is fine. It just has to be worth it.

          Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: