Starting to move from “there’s no there, there” to “erratic.”
~ by Servetus on April 8, 2017.
Posted in Richard Armitage Tags: Richard Armitage, Twitter
It’s still on instagram. I don’t get it.
Michele Doolan said this on April 8, 2017 at 4:16 pm | Reply
it may not be gettable by ordinary mortals!
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 1:17 am | Reply
This is fascinating to me. He is so weird!
sparkhouse1 said this on April 8, 2017 at 4:25 pm | Reply
“Versehentlich” gelöscht? Wirkt irgendwie willenlos auf mich.
Mir fällt beim besten Willen kein Grund ein, warum er dieses Bild hätte löschen sollen. Vielleicht beherrscht er einfach manchmal die Technik nicht… “resigniertseufz”
Elanor said this on April 8, 2017 at 4:48 pm | Reply
after almost 3 years of this … if he hasn’t mastered the tech, it’s because he doesn’t want to.
Servetus said this on April 8, 2017 at 5:02 pm | Reply
Perhaps his action of deleting a tweet has more impact than actually deleting the content as well as a different intention? Here, the same content is all over SM including his own sites and the official series site. So by deleting, he’s raised an issue that he knows causes comments – he, himself acknowledge this when he explained his deleting by tweeting that he does it to end the conversation. Why end this conversation – especially when it was just about over, anyway?
But he left up the offending RT. Curiouser and Curiouser.
Perry said this on April 8, 2017 at 4:55 pm | Reply
Wag the Dog?
Servetus said this on April 8, 2017 at 5:04 pm | Reply
Gawd. That’s all around us.( I’m thinking missile) If so, it was not a great way to divert attention, because the comparison between what was deleted and what remained keeps the discussion going.
Perry said this on April 8, 2017 at 5:06 pm | Reply
Right? If you don’t have anything to actually say, keep people talking by unsaying things you’ve said?
In general I feel like we’re just a microcosm of reality at the moment. I swear, the next time I hear someone say that because I mentioned something, I’m outraged, or losing sleep about it, or whatever … it’s a mirror in general of the anti-intellectualism I encounter everywhere. G-d forbid I admit I think about something.
Servetus said this on April 8, 2017 at 5:08 pm | Reply
Honestly, I think he’s in a bind if he belatedly agrees that his RT was improper or negligent. He knows deleting that tweet would flame the fires, and could even be viewed as a criticism of KekePalmer. He has no good options if he regrets the RT.
Perry said this on April 8, 2017 at 5:10 pm | Reply
Servetus said this on April 8, 2017 at 5:11 pm | Reply
Come on Ladies 😞 would he be affraid of a 24 years old child or something ..if he delete it , would she get annoyed with it 😶 Jeez 😶
bunnysgirl86 said this on April 8, 2017 at 7:02 pm | Reply
Afraid of blowback from a 23 year old? No. But worried that he might hurt her feelings or appear to be criticizing her by deleting the tweet? Yes, I think that is possible.
Perry said this on April 8, 2017 at 7:53 pm | Reply
Hmmmm ….that sucks big time 😨
bunnysgirl86 said this on April 9, 2017 at 8:54 pm | Reply
Not afraid, but he stepped out onto the terrain of racial politics by RTing and he can’t get off them very easily now. No matter what he does, it will be interpreted politically. Impossible not to.
Servetus said this on April 8, 2017 at 9:19 pm | Reply
bunnysgirl86 said this on April 9, 2017 at 8:56 pm | Reply
Tststs, Serv, die Erklärung ist doch ganz einfach:
Wir können absolut, vollkommen und mindestens 200%ig sicher sein, dass er dir folgt und mit angehaltenem Atem auf deinen nächsten Blogeintrag wartet. Gleichzeitig wissen wir, dass er ein emsiges Bienchen ist und nicht viel Zeit hat, schon gar nicht in den letzten paar Tagen.
Ergo: Unser Bienchen hat beim Überfliegen (har, har) nur mitbekommen, dass du einen Tweet von ihm nicht gut fandest.
Leider hatte er keine Zeit, genauer hinzugucken, also hat er einfach auf gut Glück gelöscht. Und er hatte auch nur Zeit, das Bildchen vom Stühlchen auf Twitterchen, äh, Twitter zu löschen, sonst nirgends.
In anderen Worten: Du bist schuld, dass das Bild weg ist.
Ganz klar und eindeutig. 😀
Könnte natürlich auch sein, dass alles ganz anders ist, z.B., dass er völlig unterschiedliche Gründe hat, wenn er irgendwas löscht, so dass ein Außenstehender keinen Sinn hinter seinen Lösch-Aktionen erkennen kann.
Hedgehogess said this on April 8, 2017 at 6:26 pm | Reply
That’s it! Richard Armitage is deciding what to tweet and delete based on a conspiracy theory version of my preferences!
Now I understand 🙂
Servetus said this on April 8, 2017 at 9:21 pm | Reply
Das ist wahrlich ein Augenöffner!
Wenn du ihn zum Löschen bringen kannst, kannst du ihn dann auch dazu bringen, bestimmte Bilder zu twittern… Es täten sich da Möglichkeiten auf. 😉
Elanor said this on April 8, 2017 at 11:14 pm | Reply
since I’ve only just discovered this newfound ability, it may take me some time to make it operational …
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 1:16 am | Reply
Danke für den Lachflash des Tages!!!!
Herba said this on April 10, 2017 at 10:00 am | Reply
I thought maybe he had deleted it because I saw a fair few snarky comments like ‘Richard is in Berlin… well, his chair is” and that they would rather see his face than the chair… the usual demands that it’s never quite enough… I wondered if that was it. Impossible to know. From my view he is clearly more sensitive to this stuff than he let’s on and I think people joke with him like he js a friend but he’s not. Sigh. It’s a shame it’s gone. Even more of a shame I don’t get why. Hope another one replaces it soon.
Lily said this on April 8, 2017 at 9:18 pm | Reply
well, it that’s the explanation, it’s really unfortunate for him that he has the emotional maturity of a thirteen year old and unfortunate for me that I expect him to behave like an adult.
Hehehe. Really who knows… that was the best I could do in terms of reasoning. He seems to have these moments of doubt… who knows what’s going on… tis a shame it can’t be a little more plain sailing…
Lily said this on April 8, 2017 at 9:24 pm | Reply
I thought the one with the cat in the chair was hilarious.
Yeah I thought it fun too. Who knows what was going through his head. He is a perpetual enigma…
Lily said this on April 9, 2017 at 1:19 am | Reply
i agree with what Perry said on her blog, that maybe Mr. Richard Armitage accidentally deleted the photo. but what i am thinking is maybe Mr. Richard Armitage deleted the chair photo to give us a hint that maybe his character (Daniel Miller) is going to end up missing or dead.
bloodangel said this on April 8, 2017 at 9:28 pm | Reply
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 1:18 am | Reply
Just wanted to stir the pot a bit. Give us something (more) to write about.
Mermaid said this on April 8, 2017 at 9:52 pm | Reply
Because I was so bored otherwise, lol.
Let’s face it; it was only a chair. The background had some artistic appeal however.
Mermaid said this on April 9, 2017 at 11:46 am | Reply
I feel a quotation from Freud coming on. Or Magritte.
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 4:09 pm | Reply
And – I might add – I also disapprove of the N-word (and the F-word).
Mermaid said this on April 9, 2017 at 11:48 am | Reply
“Ich kann Tweets löschen, wenn ich will, aber welche das sind, entscheide ich und nicht die shitstormende Bloggerwelt …” 😛 Statement!
Joana said this on April 9, 2017 at 11:56 am | Reply
And guess what: any blogger can talk about anything s/he wants! For any length of time at all!
But I find it amazing and amusing that for some reason you still think Richard Armitage is speaking to me. So I’ll repeat what I said at the end of the previous post: Richard Armitage is not paying attention to me. I’m SURE, however, that he is paying attention to YOU. Feel better now?
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 4:11 pm | Reply
It’s still not about YOU. Or are you the only blogger in this universe?
He doesn’t pay any attention to me. I’m fine with it.
Joana said this on April 9, 2017 at 5:14 pm | Reply
And he’s not paying any attention to me — so what is your problem, exactly? I could blog about what he does or doesn’t tweet or what he removes exclusively for months and he still would not be paying attention to me. It’s not a statement about fans. It’s a statement about him. I blog about him. Thus I blog about this issue.
Some more homework for you:
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 5:16 pm | Reply
You really need to think about whether you should start your own blog in which you articuate your view that Armitage’s tweets and deletes are exclusively a statement to fans. I’m sure it would be fascinating.
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 5:18 pm | Reply
Also, please see comments policy C7. If you have an actual argument to make instead of veiled insults to hurl, I’m interested. But I don’t have time for people who are here just to suck up my energy.
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 5:20 pm | Reply
If I’m not the only blogger in the universe, why are you so preoccupied with me? I don’t see you dropping this at anyone else’s blog?
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 5:23 pm | Reply
Maybe he wants us to look at the empty chair symbol?
Perhaps he is benefiting from his presence in Berlin, to follow a Gestalt psychotherapy? Invented by Fritz Perls, it helps to have a global vision of oneself to better understand how it works.
Or is he a fervent adept? The direct interpellation which consists of never speaking about or about someone, but to speak to him directly even if he is absent. One chooses an object, another person of the group or the empty chair. This makes it possible to cause an emotion, a difficulty on which one can work, to emerge more rapidly.
So by this chair he speaks to us. When he deletes it, he no longer wants contact…
squirrel.0072 said this on April 9, 2017 at 1:39 pm | Reply
This is a quietly beautiful reading 🙂
Servetus said this on April 9, 2017 at 4:10 pm | Reply
Thank you! The associations of ideas intersect and there emerges a fulgurance, a transcendence. When the idea is good, it helps to translate it clearly. I hope that I improve my English, taking classes again.
squirrel.0072 said this on April 9, 2017 at 8:41 pm | Reply
Note: I do not praise the Gestalt-therapy. A practice inscribed in the Mivilude health and sectarianism guide (interministerial mission of vigilance and the fight against sectarian aberrations: mission interministérielle de vigilance et de lutte contre les dérives sectaires).
squirrel.0072 said this on April 9, 2017 at 9:30 pm | Reply
I liked it, I am so sorry that it was deleted. So with the help of an art critic , I would try to write about empty chair symbols.
The chair is shown for its symbolic, artistic and poetic aspect.
– It is associated with rest, comfort, physical inactivity, but also with power (it is not nothing to have, at ones disposal, a chair to ones own effigy).
– In general, one considers the chair especially as the support to a body. It is difficult to disassociate the chair from being seated. It is so associated with the human being that, when left empty, it tends to indicate an absence, prolonged or permanent. It then serves to refer to the person who occupied it and who is no longer there. It is therefore, in such cases, at the same time symbol of absence but also of presence.
– If it is only support, the chair is then only accessory, utilitarian. It would thus be trivialized unless, in the artistic culture of today, it takes on a particular meaning. It would be, for example, the case of the representation of the chair, with as wallpaper the painting: tag. Here we are far from the still life since the chosen objects can themselves be interpreted as symbols.
In the context, where the tag was created, but also in the context of season 2 of BS, it takes a particular significance (index or not on the next developments of the series).
– But this photo is artistically beautiful, it holds the eye.
The colors are well tuned blue and purple, white and gray brown.
Defined generally by straight lines: vertical and horizontal, defined by geometric shapes: squares and / or rectangles, the chair is an interesting element to create the structure of a work. It can, for example, be used to correct the impression of imbalance, here of the tag.
One can then ask what role the chair plays here. Turning away from the tag of denunciation (the chair apparently had no participation in this action). The look would then be directed exclusively towards the message “Traffic Maffia”. Which, in reality, would not change the interest of the work, as the subject is the chair, where appears the name of “Daniel Miller”. The eyes oscillate indefinitely between the two written texts.
– One of the peculiarities of the chair is that, like a human, it stands on its feet. Hence to associate it with the human form. Indeed, the chair, perceived subjectively, returns the viewer, inevitably to the artist who should occupy it, his physical, his lived, his supposed occupation or any history ( RA playing LLLact 1 for me).
-There would remain only the chair, the ordinary object, which is no less linked to the time one passes on it, for various reasons.
We have here a successful work which produces an enigma. Thus the interpretation established by the spectator will be the product of a choice, of the definition of what he sees in the image. He will use his imagination, his experience and his memory to draw something from photography. So the imagined story could be a poetry.
squirrel.0072 said this on April 9, 2017 at 10:54 pm | Reply
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Click on the image to see fan support and donate!
Like / Friend / Follow me on Facebook [click here]
Blog at WordPress.com.