Less ambiguous hands-on-face Richard Armitage?
This is a photo by David Venni, taken sometime around the late fall of 2009. Contrast to the hand position of the photo by Leslie Hassler in Guylty’s *ooof*.
This is a photo by David Venni, taken sometime around the late fall of 2009. Contrast to the hand position of the photo by Leslie Hassler in Guylty’s *ooof*.
~ by Servetus on November 20, 2013.
Posted in Richard Armitage
Tags: David Venni, face, hands, Richard Armitage
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
🙂 yawning?
LikeLike
Joanna said this on November 20, 2013 at 7:51 am |
Great, you dug a picture up that can be compared to the Hassler shot. I have to say, I think this one is actually much truer to life than the Hassler shot. This appears less posed – especially because he is hiding so much of his face behind the hands, something that the photographer probably would have prevented, and because he seems to be caught while moving his head forward, as we often do when we break out laughing.
Looks like a natural gesture during the shoot, laughing at a joke of the photographer, maybe. I like the symmetry of the shot, and that there is a hint of a smile in his eyes.
Again, a shot that somehow discloses more by showing less…
LikeLike
guylty said this on November 20, 2013 at 10:45 am |
I remember at the time that these came out (some time after they were taken) people were really enchanted with the hands on face images — this being IMO the best one. It does look more spontaneous and I’m glad you explained why.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on November 20, 2013 at 5:03 pm |
I think it actually has an air of sweetness in it. That, I suspect, is gone by now… Too many shoots spoil the sitter, as the old saying goes.
LikeLike
guylty said this on November 20, 2013 at 9:56 pm |
Interesting! I did not know that saying.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on November 20, 2013 at 9:58 pm |
Serv!!!!!!!!!!! In imitation of “too many cooks spoil the broth” 😉 Not sure if all togs would agree with me, but I do think that experience – while making it easier for the photographer – also takes away the innocence of the sitter.
LikeLike
guylty said this on November 20, 2013 at 10:00 pm |
Yeah, you are so right, Guylty! As just said, thanks for this wonderful explanation. And a big “wow” for the ever attentive Servetus for bringing the two pictures “together”. This is so eye-opening.
LikeLike
linda60 said this on November 20, 2013 at 11:56 pm |
It takes more than just two eyes to see it all. It’s great to see it all together.
LikeLike
guylty said this on November 21, 2013 at 1:10 am |
Yes, this is much better. Still open to view but more honest and unposed.
LikeLike
Peggy Kincaid said this on November 20, 2013 at 8:52 pm |
Nothing scintillating to add to the comments, just……I love his hands.
LikeLike
Mezz said this on November 21, 2013 at 12:22 am |
which have not been altered by being too often photographed 🙂
LikeLike
Servetus said this on November 21, 2013 at 12:52 am |
😀
LikeLike
linda60 said this on November 21, 2013 at 1:09 am |