This is rich, isn’t it. Rich?
Read the caps from bottom to top.
In my opinion, it would be really, really helpful, most helpful, in fact, if Richard Armitage’s fans noticed this, but rather as a means to encourage fans NOT to police each other. Fans telling each other how to behave regarding non-criminal behavior is the single most annoying moment of our fandom. It also regularly leads to bullying-like behaviors.
If a fan does something you don’t like, as long as it’s not against the law, ignore it. We can use our “mute” or “block” options. Let everyone look to his/her own conscience — I for one have enough to do if I stick to that. And fandom is more fun that way — for all of us.
Oh geez. -.-
Sure am glad there’s someone out there to shame and police my behavior. I might have forgotten I’m a grown-ass adult woman otherwise.
LikeLike
alyssabethancourt said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:15 am |
That’s what came through to me from this message, too. Shame on you. Not just people who do something that’s the equivalent of sending junk mail, a nuisance, but harmless, but shame on Armitage fans in general.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:17 am |
you can’t have your cake and eat it too. if some fans think she has an “in” with Richard, that’s perfectly understandable considering the way she’s aligned herself with our fandom in the past. but instead of addressing this with kindness and tact, she calls out our fandom for this annoying behavior publicly instead. and our fansites should help her clean up the mess? I think someone needs a lesson is public relations.
LikeLike
KellyDS said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:17 am |
Yeah, shame is a poor motivator.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:21 am |
eyeroll
Really.
LikeLike
zeesmuse said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:25 am |
Correct me if I’m wrong, but she hasn’t interviewed him in over a year, right????
LikeLike
zeesmuse said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:32 am |
I think maybe the last time was Dec of 2014.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:53 am |
It has been a while. Sooooo I’m thinking why would anyone think she has like, REAL contact with him???
Don’t mind me, just thinkin’ outloud.
LikeLike
zeesmuse said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:57 am |
well, I do teach history, so I have a lot of personal experience of people not understanding how time works, but yeah, I know what you’re thinking and I think a lot of people are wondering that, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:02 am |
Now, that is an interesting point. Really would like to have a heart to heart talk with you about how time works! 😀
LikeLike
linda60 said this on January 17, 2016 at 10:22 pm |
If I ever figure it out, I’ll call you for a meeting!
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 18, 2016 at 12:27 am |
🙂 Time will tell……
LikeLike
linda60 said this on January 18, 2016 at 1:11 am |
I agree, Serv, and also with your comments, Kelly. I think singling out RA fans in particular rather than a more general statement is pretty tasteless, and makes me think she’s annoyed about more than just this. I already see some fans annoyed about being tarred with this brush, and think this probably won’t serve her well in the long run.
LikeLike
SHeRA said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:39 am |
“Sorry can’t help” and a block would do wonders.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:54 am |
Right! How hard would that be?? smh
LikeLike
SHeRA said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:56 am |
Not hard, but if you have to do it on a regular basis it would be pretty darn annoying.
LikeLike
Skully (@neonblackblog) said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:02 am |
She’s a journalist, though, so it’s part of her job. But honestly, how often do you think she’s doing it? Do you think she is even doing it once a day? Once a week?
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:03 am |
Yes, she is a journalist, so no doubt she deals with the same stuff that all journalists do in the online space. But apparently in this instance it is outside of the ordinary, beyond the normal stuff she deals with.
LikeLike
Skully (@neonblackblog) said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:12 am |
I doubt it. She’s been shaming us since December of 2014, and possibly before that — I just wasn’t watching as closely before I became a target.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:13 am |
So you think she is fabricating or grossly exaggerating this?
LikeLike
Skully (@neonblackblog) said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:24 am |
Fabricating, no. Anyone who spends a lot of time on Armitage gets a certain amount of odd mesages. All of the fan sites have to stress, repeatedly, that they are not connected with Armitage and cannot / do not pass on messages (although I suppose she would be an exception, since she has a kind of direct connection to him that none of the fan sites have). That she is blowing a nuisance into a big deal in order to get attention? Yeah, I think that’s entirely possible. I think some other people think that, too, it’s just no one’s been so impolite as to say that, yet.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:39 am |
ok. well, whatever her motivations, I can relate to wanting to minimise nuisance from one’s work!
LikeLike
Skully (@neonblackblog) said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:06 am
Sure. Although depending on how we define work, she’s also a nuisance to other people.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:08 am
Oh dear! Who besieged my favorite candidate to the Pulitzer Prize? 😦
LikeLike
Joanna said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:52 am |
LOL — the price of fame.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:54 am |
I think she is up for the “best hair extensions” Pulitzer category. It’s competitive: journalists’ rigorously persue high grooming standards. She is also a strong contender in the false eyelash category.
LikeLike
Kathy Jones said this on January 17, 2016 at 9:31 am |
Shaming and kind of boastful too in a round about way. I don’t follow her on Twitter…does she play other fandoms the way she played ours?
LikeLike
kathrynruthd said this on January 17, 2016 at 12:58 am |
I dunno, because she blocked me for a while, and I don’t really follow other fandoms. I know she tried and tried and tried to get interviews with the Outlander people — don’t think that every happened? I think Armitage is possible the celeb, and thus the fandom, that she got closest to.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:04 am |
So a victim of her own success then so to speak…I have no sympathy for her. You play with fire, you’re gonna get burnt etc etc.
LikeLike
kathrynruthd said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:19 am |
yeah, she made herself dependent on him and to some extent on his fandom.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:03 am |
Just noticed it on Twitter where her tweets have been retweeted. And I feel quite put out by it. Partly because I feel shamed as a fan of RA. But also because it sounds like a call for a witch hunt to me, for which the fandom is being instrumentalised.
And please – I doubt that this sort of thing only happens in our fandom! All considered, I really think her whining serves less as a real deterrent, but is just another way of getting attention for herself. Not to be dignified with further response.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Guylty said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:03 am |
You and I just differ on this. For me, defending fans is important because we are shamed at every turn. The pattern is interesting — we got it from Sarah Dunn, we got it from some of the Hannibal folks — and if it’s a general phenomenon associated with being a fan, I’m going to write about it — and have written about it before as a general pattern. They want you to “buy in” but if you don’t behave according to their fantasy of how you should behave — shame, shame. Or even if you do, because if you do do what they want, then they shame you for being ridiculous.
But I certainly understand the arguments for your reaction.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:06 am |
I think you miss understood me. I meant that her whining is not to be reacted to, or taken as directions on how to behave. I think it is important to call anyone out, who is trying to shame others into behaving a particular way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Guylty said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:09 am |
Sorry, reply below.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:11 am |
Does she not know how to set up email filters and use twitter blocking?
Although I am kind of cruelly amused by this – she seemed to want fans to think she had a special relationship/connection with him, wanted to be a mouthpiece to the fandom, and now that some people take that seriously she finds it inconvenient . . .
LikeLike
Antigone_ks said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:03 am |
I think “messages you don’t want” are a negative externality of the job she says she wants. I get all kinds of messages I would rather not read (although it’s been falling off lately — maybe everyone has given up?).
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:11 am |
You’re clearly a lost cause, Serv 😛
LikeLike
Antigone_ks said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:23 am |
I’m a loser, baby … 🙂
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:04 am |
aha, okay. I apologize. Thanks for clearing it up!
There’s just so much shame in fandom already, we don’t need people magnifying it or encouraging it as a general cultural practice.
I can get that from the dentist, lol.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:10 am |
Why would I, as an “RA fan group” (I presume I am in that group as I blog and have some followers) even want to get involved in this? I could imagine that “it’s the only fan group this happens with” because RA is the only star TAC has ever been able to interview at length, but maybe I’m wrong and maybe many other reasons play into this. Fact remains, I don’t know why this happens, I don’t know who does it, I wouldn’t know who to address! Why should I scold my readers for something that I think they don’t even do? This is something between TAC and these date-seekers. Just block the wackos, tell them off in private if needs be, and be done with it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Esther said this on January 17, 2016 at 1:58 am |
Yeah, I don’t know if you’re familiar with that “don’t put beans up your nose” folktale, but this feels like that for me. Even if we could identify people who were likely to be doing this, it would be pointless to tell them not to (they are not listening to us anyhow).
It’s a bit like how out of joint people used to get about that story that someone sent him a bikini picture of herself with the phone on it. Okay, whatever. Cost of doing business. I wonder if it helps people’s feelings of self-righteousness, though?
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:06 am |
I don’t get the bikini picture reference but the beans up your nose thing – yes! I was thinking that too! I can so imagine that now she’ll be getting more people than ever seeking dates with RA… ah, the joy of attention…
LikeLike
Esther said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:14 am |
He revealed in a newspaper interview around 2009 that someone had sent him picture of herself in a bikini, with her cell phone number written across it. He was embarrassed (mentioned that his mum sees this stuff) and it was a sort of stone of contention back in the day — is it okay to send Armitage questionable stuff?
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:19 am |
Oh, that! Yeah, well, he likes a bit of a dirty joke himself so I’m sure he can take it… especially if his mum doesn’t see it…
LikeLike
Esther said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:24 am |
I also think that was six years ago and I hope that he’s gotten used to the sort of things people say to celebrities.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:26 am |
Yep. And hey, they make for nice anecdotes…
LikeLike
Esther said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:28 am |
Acceptable behavior or not, this sort of thing has gone on for as long as there have been celebrities. It is not a new phenomenon unique to the RA fandom, and it is ridiculous to suggest we are somehow a new breed of rabid horndog in dire need of reining in lest the poor object of our affections be destroyed by our inappropriate libidos.
LikeLike
alyssabethancourt said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:29 am |
It’s not even unique to celebrities – I’ve known it to happen to normal everyday men too. For some women, it’s a way of flirting.
LikeLike
Bollyknickers said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:34 am |
I think her argument is that she’s the one being destroyed by our horndog libidos (great turn of phrase. Are you a writer?)
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 5:18 am |
Yeah, I feel approximately this sorry for her “predicament”:
LikeLike
alyssabethancourt said this on January 17, 2016 at 5:38 am |
What a literary eye-opening I get from this community! I just looked up the beans-up-your-nose story.
I agree with everyone who says these tweets were attention seeking.
LikeLike
csprof said this on January 17, 2016 at 4:17 pm |
Oh she’s just tooting her own horn. There’s a whiff of desperation there IMHO. I tend to agree with the ‘ignore her’ camp because although I agree that fan shaming is a low act, any attention just extends her 15 minutes of fame, and we can all do without that.
LikeLike
Bollyknickers said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:04 am |
Unfortunately she’s been on my mind a lot lately because I’ve been trying to come to terms with 2014/15. But yeah, her professional future is her own thing.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:09 am |
i don’t blame you for that. I’d like to say karma will catch up with her but unfortunately it sometimes seems to take its sweet time.
((((((((Hugs))))))))))
LikeLike
Bollyknickers said this on January 17, 2016 at 2:28 am |
Thanks 🙂
Her fate is her own, I think — the thing that I’m trying to figure out is how the encounter with her affected my fandom, and oddly that’s not really all about her … stay tuned.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:07 am |
I replied to her. Now I want some cheese.
LikeLike
kari said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:00 am |
I got lotsa cheese. Including the tail end of a bag of curd dad bought fresh this morning. What kind?
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:04 am |
[…] Hmmm. Be careful what you wish for Marlise. I think some Richard Armitage fans will definitely be reporting on this. See here, This is rich, isn’t it Rich? […]
LikeLike
She’s No Pimp! | Armitage Agonistes said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:06 am |
Pepperjack!!
LikeLike
kari said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:07 am |
I do not have that, sadly. However, I could sprinkle some salsa on a slice of mozzarella …
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:08 am |
I’ll take it! Thank you! 😀
LikeLike
kari said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:20 am |
A comment from an Outlander fan:
The Rank and File @RRankinFans 5h5 hours ago
@AnglophileTV haha I’m sorry for laughing but that’s hilarious! Like don’t you have any real work to do?? 😂😂 #KeepThemToYourself
IMO we’re the only fan group she’s had any measurable contact with. She also added:… It’s aggravating! I’ve become the Anglophile Dating Service! #Grrgh If you only KNEW what I’ve had to put up w/this group.
Exactly how does she decide who is in the “group?” I would think she would have enough knowledge of the internet to know there is a wide variety of people represented fandom or no.
LikeLike
richardtreehouse said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:19 am |
What group?
LikeLike
kari said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:32 am |
It’s in the same conversation so I believe she is talking about Richard’s fans.
LikeLike
richardtreehouse said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:33 am |
Oh ok, thanks! I am a very literal person and assumed there was a group on Facebook LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
kari said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:35 am |
I think it’s odd to assume that organized groups of fans would likely have any influence at all over what the odd fan does or doesn’t do. I mean, I can prevent you from speaking on my blog, but I can’t prevent you from tweeting anyone else for any reason. Without more information — I mean, who knows, it could be someone from China who misunderstands what is going on due to translation or cultural differences, or it could be a teenager doing it on a dare, or it could be … I mean, I could go on and on. Worst case, it’s someone disturbed — in which case fans will have zero affect on what that person does …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:35 am |
Marlise answered “Exactly” to the comment from TheRank and File so perhaps I misread it. I thought they were asking Marlise if she had any real work to do. Anybody else read it the way I did?
LikeLike
richardtreehouse said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:43 am |
I think it was unclear — I also assumed that “you” was MB. But maybe “you” was “fans who PM Marlise asking for dates.”
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:44 am |
Better and better: https://twitter.com/AnglophileTV/status/688542709619896321
She didn’t like a tweet she got at her personal account so she uses her media account to shame the fandom. #honestlymarlisewhohasboundaryproblems
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:32 am |
That seems pretty disproportionate & sweeping to me. I guess the intent is for us all to be embarrassed, ashamed & turn on each other, rather than simply unfollow TAC en masse if we really make her life so difficult. Understand, I’m not proposing that, but if she wants to treat us as a monolithic herd, that could cut both ways. I understand the annoyance factor, but there are more professional & less insulting ways she could have addressed this.
LikeLike
SHeRA said this on January 17, 2016 at 4:58 am |
It’s like I said, you can’t capitalize the fandom while suppressing it. I didn’t want to be rude to her, but you can’t have it both ways. She didn’t reply to my latest comment so I dunno.
LikeLike
kari said this on January 17, 2016 at 5:19 am |
yeah, you put that well (#hardtobepithyin140characters)
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 5:25 am |
yeah. This is an issue I have myself — students who find out my private address and write me at it. It would be like after getting an unwanted mail at that address, I yelled at all my classes. Tja.
I think if someone proposed that she be unfollowed it could be characterized as bullying (also I already don’t follow her, I think). But this is definitely a turn-off.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 5:20 am |
Correct, but I think getting DM’s at a personal twitter acct is different (& more easily handled) scenario than students emailing your personal address.
And of course, she talks about the whole Anglophile world, not just Richard, which some fans maybe got confused about in the past. Once again, we’re grownups and can make up our own minds about the value of the site to each of us personally, depending on our interests 🙂
LikeLike
SHeRA said this on January 17, 2016 at 6:53 am |
LOL! Sorry for laughing so hard. This whole situation is hilarious.
Like her, instead of shaming the RA fandom, I took it upon myself to shame my Lucy for destroying something very expensive I bought. I was really angry and pissed, so I posted pictures of my Lucy with the item she destroyed.
As soon as I read this Anglophile dating service thing with RA situation, I thought wow. I was doing exactly what she was doing, but to my poor Lucy. Realizing this, I deleted my tweets.
MB may or may not be receiving these PMs for hook-ups with RA. Unfortunately, by expressing displeasure at the RA fandom it only made her look bad to many people. IMO, I think people should give her the benefit of the doubt. She is only human like the rest of the people commenting on this. Except me, I’m a dog if you haven’t noticed.🐶😄😜
LikeLike
Duke said this on January 17, 2016 at 10:38 am |
Thank you, I wasn’t trying to toot my own horn there. Or was I?.???? Sorry, I am a bit sleepy and hyper. I agree, I once went through the same thing Servetus, so I get where she’s coming from. But hashtagging Richard was not going to help her cause but draw more attention to her.
LikeLike
kari said this on January 17, 2016 at 5:35 am |
I just finally saw the theory expressed that this is all clickbait — so it’s more than attention that she wants #baitingthearmitagefansforprofit
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 6:56 am |
I remembered this gif and thought it appropriate 😀
LikeLike
KellyDS said this on January 17, 2016 at 3:38 pm |
LOL!
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 9:06 pm |
I don’t get this. I may be naive (the story is repeating itself (shrugs)). I just don’t get it. When Marlise Boland receives these requests on her private twitter count to set up dates with RA, (and how many requests is she talking about?), why does she then reply en-masse on her public, business twitter account? Communicatively, it’s all wrong, and it doesn’t make sense. What’s the purpose of it? I don’t get this. Other than this comment, I choose to ignore…
LikeLike
Mermaid said this on January 17, 2016 at 8:56 pm |
it occurred to me after looking at the Armitage stream on Twitter this morning that she wanted to get some attention during the excitement about the awards show this evening. Good time to stir up a storm.
LikeLike
Servetus said this on January 17, 2016 at 9:06 pm |
Welcome to showbiz (just as @KellyDS remarked above) 🙂
LikeLike
Mermaid said this on January 17, 2016 at 9:55 pm |
I’m thinking, “It’s January. Things are slow. MB is bored so she thinks it’s time to revisit her old hobby of creating a shit-storm in the RA fandom.”
I haven’t thought about her in probably over a year now. It was nice. Now I am going to go back to pretending she doesn’t exist, because she is doing nothing useful and everything that’s negative and attention-seeking. If Richard Armitage is smart, he’ll stay clear of participating in any more interviews with her. She is pretty unprofessional.
LikeLike
Babette said this on January 17, 2016 at 10:12 pm |
It seems pretty obvious if you answer on a public forum what could have been answered in a private way what the purpose was. Public notice for her show. RA is probably one of the most drawing of guests she has interviewed on her show and she needs more publicity if even in connection to his name. To totally pinpoint a whole fandom shows such a lack of common sense and lack of professionalism it amazes me that she would even go there. She does herself and her twitter channel more harm than anything else.
LikeLike
Irish Witch said this on January 18, 2016 at 12:56 am |
[…] “This is rich, isn’t it. Rich?” January 16, 2016. Marlise Boland complains about Richard Armitage’s […]
LikeLike
2016 at “me + richard armitage” in review | Me + Richard Armitage said this on January 3, 2017 at 11:28 pm |